From 940d3a24319ed7fd67ae0f400add78af4e37b1c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@orlitzky.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 23:55:33 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] run-tests.sh: use auto-incrementing test numbers.

---
 run-tests.sh | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/run-tests.sh b/run-tests.sh
index 7873932..923c19c 100755
--- a/run-tests.sh
+++ b/run-tests.sh
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ BIN=$(realpath src/apply-default-acl)
 # The directory where we'll do all the ACL manipulation.
 TESTDIR=test
 
+# Will auto-increment.
+TESTNUM=0
+
 acl_reset() {
     # Remove any ACLs on our test directory and remove its contents.
     setfacl --remove-all --recursive "${TESTDIR}"
@@ -69,7 +72,7 @@ mkdir "${TESTDIR}"
 
 # When using a minimal ACL, the default user, group, and other
 # permissions should all be propagated to the mode bits.
-TESTNUM=1
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 777 "${TARGET}"
@@ -90,7 +93,7 @@ ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
 compare
 
 # Do the same thing as the last test, except with an extended ACL.
-TESTNUM=2
+((TESTNUM++))
 setfacl -d -m user::r--     "${TESTDIR}"
 setfacl -d -m group::r--    "${TESTDIR}"
 setfacl -d -m other::r--    "${TESTDIR}"
@@ -115,7 +118,7 @@ compare
 
 # A file shared by a group, should still be group-writable
 # afterwards.
-TESTNUM=3
+((TESTNUM++))
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
 setfacl -d -m group:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
@@ -136,7 +139,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # Same test as before except with a directory.
-TESTNUM=4
+((TESTNUM++))
 setfacl -d -m group:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
 mkdir "${TARGET}"
 chmod 755 "${TARGET}"
@@ -162,7 +165,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # With no default, things are left alone.
-TESTNUM=5
+((TESTNUM++))
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 744 "${TARGET}"
 $BIN "${TARGET}"
@@ -183,7 +186,7 @@ compare
 
 # Since the default ACL will grant r-x to group/other, they will wind
 # up with it.
-TESTNUM=6
+((TESTNUM++))
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 744 "${TARGET}"
 setfacl -d -m user:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
@@ -206,7 +209,7 @@ compare
 
 # Some named entries can be granted execute permissions as the result
 # of reapplication.
-TESTNUM=7
+((TESTNUM++))
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 744 "${TARGET}"
 setfacl -m user:${USERS[1]}:rw "${TARGET}"
@@ -235,7 +238,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # We should not retain any entries that aren't in the default.
-TESTNUM=8
+((TESTNUM++))
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
 setfacl -m user:${USERS[1]}:rw "${TARGET}"
@@ -257,7 +260,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # A slightly modified test #1 to make sure it works right.
-TESTNUM=9
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 777 "${TARGET}"
@@ -278,7 +281,7 @@ compare
 
 # If the default ACL mask denies execute, we should respect that
 # regardless of the existing execute permissions.
-TESTNUM=10
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 777 "${TARGET}"
@@ -304,7 +307,7 @@ compare
 
 # The --recursive mode should work normally if the argument is a
 # normal file. See Test #1.
-TESTNUM=11
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 setfacl -d -m user::r--  "${TESTDIR}"
 setfacl -d -m group::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
@@ -326,7 +329,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # The --recursive mode should work recursively.
-TESTNUM=12
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 mkdir -p "${TARGET}"
 touch "${TARGET}"/baz
@@ -352,7 +355,7 @@ compare
 
 # The --recursive mode should work recursively. This time
 # check a directory, and pass the short command-line flag.
-TESTNUM=13
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 mkdir -p "${TARGET}"
 touch "${TARGET}"/baz
@@ -381,7 +384,7 @@ compare
 
 # Test double application on a directory.
 #
-TESTNUM=14
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/baz
 mkdir "${TARGET}"
 chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
@@ -411,7 +414,7 @@ compare
 
 # Same as previous test, with 755 initial perms.
 #
-TESTNUM=15
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/baz
 mkdir "${TARGET}"
 chmod 755 "${TARGET}"
@@ -441,7 +444,7 @@ compare
 
 # Same as previous two tests, only with a file.
 #
-TESTNUM=16
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
@@ -464,7 +467,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # User-executable files should not wind up exec-masked.
-TESTNUM=17
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 700 "${TARGET}"
@@ -486,7 +489,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # Group-executable files should not wind up exec-masked.
-TESTNUM=18
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 670 "${TARGET}"
@@ -508,7 +511,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # Other-executable files should not wind up exec-masked.
-TESTNUM=19
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 607 "${TARGET}"
@@ -532,7 +535,7 @@ compare
 
 # Test #16's setup repeated with the --no-exec-mask flag.
 #
-TESTNUM=20
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
@@ -559,7 +562,7 @@ compare
 
 # Test #20 repeated recursively to make sure the flags play nice
 # together.
-TESTNUM=21
+((TESTNUM++))
 PARENT_DIR="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 TARGET="${PARENT_DIR}"/bar
 mkdir "${PARENT_DIR}"
@@ -585,7 +588,7 @@ compare
 # Make sure a mask with an execute bit doesn't count as being
 # executable.
 #
-TESTNUM=22
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
 touch "${TARGET}"
 chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
@@ -612,7 +615,7 @@ compare
 
 # Same as test #2, except we pass multiple files on the command
 # line and check the result of the first one.
-TESTNUM=23
+((TESTNUM++))
 setfacl -d -m user::r--     "${TESTDIR}"
 setfacl -d -m group::r--    "${TESTDIR}"
 setfacl -d -m other::r--    "${TESTDIR}"
@@ -640,7 +643,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # Same as the previous test with the argument order switched.
-TESTNUM=24
+((TESTNUM++))
 setfacl -d -m user::r--     "${TESTDIR}"
 setfacl -d -m group::r--    "${TESTDIR}"
 setfacl -d -m other::r--    "${TESTDIR}"
@@ -668,20 +671,20 @@ compare
 
 # If we call apply-default-acl on a single file that does not exist,
 # we get the expected error.
-TESTNUM=25
+((TESTNUM++))
 ACTUAL=$( "${BIN}" test/nonexistent 2>&1 )
 EXPECTED="test/nonexistent: No such file or directory"
 compare
 
 # Same as the previous test, but with --recursive.
-TESTNUM=26
+((TESTNUM++))
 ACTUAL=$( "${BIN}" --recursive test/nonexistent 2>&1 )
 EXPECTED="test/nonexistent: No such file or directory"
 compare
 
 # If we call apply-default-acl on more than one file, it should report any
 # that don't exist (but proceed to operate on the others).
-TESTNUM=27
+((TESTNUM++))
 DUMMY1="${TESTDIR}/dummy1"
 DUMMY2="${TESTDIR}/dummy2"
 touch "${DUMMY1}" "${DUMMY2}"
@@ -691,7 +694,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # Ensure that symlinks are not followed.
-TESTNUM=28
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
 LINK2TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo-sym"
 touch "${TARGET}"
@@ -711,7 +714,7 @@ compare
 
 # Ensure that symlinks are not followed in subdirectories
 # (recursively).
-TESTNUM=29
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/bar"
 touch "${TARGET}"
 mkdir "${TESTDIR}/foo"
@@ -725,7 +728,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # Ensure that hard links are ignored.
-TESTNUM=30
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
 LINK2TARGET="${TESTDIR}/bar"
 touch "${TARGET}"
@@ -746,7 +749,7 @@ compare
 # We should be able to run the tool with a relative path from within a
 # directory that contains a symlink, so long as the relative path
 # doesn't contain one.
-TESTNUM=31
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo/bar"
 LINK2TARGET="${TESTDIR}/baz"
 mkdir -p $(dirname "${TARGET}")
@@ -770,7 +773,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # Ensure that symlinks in non-terminal path components are not followed.
-TESTNUM=32
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo/bar/baz"
 LINK2FOO="${TESTDIR}/quux"
 mkdir -p $(dirname "${TARGET}")
@@ -784,7 +787,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # Test that our exit code succeeds on a single, normal path.
-TESTNUM=33
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
 touch "${TARGET}"
 setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TESTDIR}"
@@ -795,7 +798,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # Test that our exit code fails on a symlink.
-TESTNUM=34
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/bar"
 touch "${TESTDIR}/foo"
 ln -s foo "${TARGET}"
@@ -807,7 +810,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # The previous test should fail, even if we use --recursive.
-TESTNUM=35
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/bar"
 touch "${TESTDIR}/foo"
 ln -s foo "${TARGET}"
@@ -819,7 +822,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # Test the return value for nonexistent paths.
-TESTNUM=36
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
 "${BIN}" "${TARGET}" &>/dev/null
 ACTUAL="$?"
@@ -830,7 +833,7 @@ compare
 # Test that one "failure" exit code overrides two "successes"
 # We need a default ACL on ${TESTDIR} because otherwise we do
 # nothing, successfully, on the symlink path.
-TESTNUM=37
+((TESTNUM++))
 mkdir "${TESTDIR}/foo"
 ln -s foo "${TESTDIR}/bar"
 mkdir "${TESTDIR}/baz"
@@ -842,7 +845,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # The failure should prevail when using --recursive, too.
-TESTNUM=38
+((TESTNUM++))
 mkdir "${TESTDIR}/foo"
 ln -s foo "${TESTDIR}/bar"
 mkdir "${TESTDIR}/baz"
@@ -854,7 +857,7 @@ compare
 
 # We should get "Not a directory" if we stick a trailing slash on the
 # end of the path to a file.
-TESTNUM=39
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
 touch "${TARGET}"
 ACTUAL=$( "${BIN}" "${TARGET}/" 2>&1 )
@@ -864,7 +867,7 @@ compare
 
 # We should be a no-op on files contained in directories that have no
 # default ACL.
-TESTNUM=40
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
 touch "${TARGET}"
 setfacl --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
@@ -876,7 +879,7 @@ compare
 
 # We should be a no-op on directories contained in directories that
 # have no default ACL (same as the previous test, but with a directory).
-TESTNUM=41
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
 mkdir "${TARGET}"
 setfacl --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
@@ -888,7 +891,7 @@ compare
 
 
 # Make sure we descend into subdirectories that don't have default ACLs.
-TESTNUM=42
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo/bar/baz"
 mkdir -p $(dirname "${TARGET}")
 touch "${TARGET}"
@@ -903,7 +906,7 @@ compare
 
 # Ensure that we don't get "error" results for symlinks encountered
 # during a recursive traversal.
-TESTNUM=43
+((TESTNUM++))
 TARGET="${TESTDIR}"
 mkdir "${TARGET}/foo"
 mkdir "${TARGET}/bar"
-- 
2.44.2