Michael Orlitzky [Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:56:56 +0000 (08:56 -0400)]
eja: add a WIP gram-schmidt for EJA elements.
This doesn't really work right now because we need a whole bunch of
algebraic numbers that we don't know a priori. I might need to suck
it up and just use AA instead of quadratic number fields.
Michael Orlitzky [Mon, 26 Aug 2019 04:00:00 +0000 (00:00 -0400)]
eja: introduce an intermediate class for "concrete" algebras.
There were two TODO items that are basically impossible: we can't
construct a "random" EJA from (say) an associative matrix algebra,
mainly because we don't know its rank. For that reason, it doesn't
make sense to have random_instance() defined in the parent class.
Now there's a subclass (KnownRankEJA) with those methods.
Michael Orlitzky [Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:10:14 +0000 (16:10 -0400)]
eja: refactor some of the basis and inner-product stuff.
This is movement towards eventually cheating on the charpoly
coefficients, which we should be able to compute in the "nice" basis
and then scale to the normalized one. The coefficients are polynomials
in "the coordinates of x", and those coordinates change only by a
scalar multiple when we normalize the basis.
Michael Orlitzky [Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:50:55 +0000 (10:50 -0400)]
eja: add "normalize" argument to matrix algebra constructors.
This is useful for two reasons:
1. It's nice to be able to test that some things are invariant
under changes of basis.
2. The min/charpoly computations will be a lot faster if we
can use the basis over QQ (i.e. if the properties that we're
testing in the first item hold).
Michael Orlitzky [Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:28:06 +0000 (17:28 -0400)]
eja: use NumberField instead of QuadraticField everywhere.
This will be more extensible when we need a field containing both
sqrt(2) and sqrt(-1). QuadraticField can't handle that, so we have to
use NumberField anyway at that point. Might as well get it out of the
way.
Michael Orlitzky [Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:46:16 +0000 (16:46 -0400)]
eja: normalize the real symmetric matrix basis.
This is necessary to ensure that the default basis representation is
an isometry. When it is not, the left-multiplication operator is
self-adjoint (by the Jordan axiom), but its matrix with respect to
that basis is not. The other two matrix algebras need similar fixing.
Michael Orlitzky [Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:11:32 +0000 (11:11 -0400)]
eja: use the basis space ring instead of the element's during construction.
Basically, when we're constructing an element, we're trying to fit
some given representation into a pre-existing space. Thus it makes
sense to build that space out of the pre-existing stuff, and not from
the element's base ring. This makes sense in general.
Michael Orlitzky [Sat, 10 Aug 2019 00:00:04 +0000 (20:00 -0400)]
eja: fix the natural representation in trivial subalgebras.
The natural representation relies on knowing a matrix space, and in a
trivial subalgebra there ain't no matrices to have no spaces. To work
around that, the space is now computed/stored separately, in a new
natural_basis_space() method. This is then overridden in the subalgebra
class to do the right thing.
eja: ensure that Sage doesn't think EJAs are associative.
It turns out that the FiniteDimensionalAlgebrasWithBasis category
somehow has both the legacy Algebras() category and the newer
MagmaticAlgebras() category as super-categories. Problem is, the
legacy one is associative! To fix that, we now use MagmaticAlgebras
directly.
Of course, we have to reimplement some of the stuff that was done for
us before... and we have to add a bunch of hacks for parts of Sage
that break when you don't have a ring.... and we can't use a matrix
for our multiplication table any more. But it was all doable.
This way, we don't need to either regenerate it when someone calls
multiplication_table(), or cache a second copy of it. Besides,
matrices are efficient and indexing one is probably faster than
indexing a list of lists.
eja: switch some index orderings to agree with row-then-column semantics.
This doesn't actually affect anything in these cases, but the row "i"
indices should be on the outside whenever we loop through a
two-dimensional array that corresponds to a matrix.