From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@orlitzky.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 22:56:49 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: eja: update the TODO again.
X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.michael.orlitzky.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3cd987f3ace9517518510e985eb7d1996a924a68;p=sage.d.git

eja: update the TODO again.
---

diff --git a/mjo/eja/TODO b/mjo/eja/TODO
index 8f9c17f..fe18d56 100644
--- a/mjo/eja/TODO
+++ b/mjo/eja/TODO
@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
-1. Finish CartesisnProductEJA: add to_matrix(), random_instance(),
+1. Finish CartesianProductEJA: add to_matrix(), random_instance(),
    one()... methods. This will require rethinking what a "matrix
    representation" and "matrix space" means for a cartesian product
    algebra. Do we want our matrix basis to consist of ordered pairs
-   (or triples, or...)? Should the matrix_space() of the algebra
-   be the cartesian product of the factors' matrix spaces? Can
-   the FDEJA initializer be made to work on tuples, or will it
-   need to be overridden?
+   (or triples, or...)? Should the matrix_space() of the algebra be
+   the cartesian product of the factors' matrix spaces? Can we just
+   fix the matrix basis/space after we call the FDEJA initializer?
 
 2. Add references and start citing them.