touch "${TARGET}"
ln -s foo "${LINK2FOO}"
setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw $(dirname "${TARGET}")
+EXPECTED=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
"${BIN}" "${LINK2FOO}/bar/baz"
ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
-EXPECTED=$(cat <<EOF
-user::rw-
-group::r--
-other::r--
-
-EOF
-)
compare
compare
-# The previous test should "succeed" if we use --recursive. This is
-# buggy, but it's documented.
+# The previous test should fail, even if we use --recursive.
TESTNUM=35
TARGET="${TESTDIR}/bar"
touch "${TESTDIR}/foo"
setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TESTDIR}"
"${BIN}" --recursive "${TARGET}"
ACTUAL="$?"
-EXPECTED="0"
+EXPECTED="1"
compare
compare
-# And test the buggy behavior again; the previous test should return
-# success (ignoring the failure) when --recursive is used.
+# The failure should prevail when using --recursive, too.
TESTNUM=38
mkdir "${TESTDIR}/foo"
ln -s foo "${TESTDIR}/bar"
mkdir "${TESTDIR}/baz"
"${BIN}" --recursive "${TESTDIR}"
ACTUAL="$?"
-EXPECTED="0"
+EXPECTED="1"
compare
"${BIN}" --recursive "${TESTDIR}"
ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
compare
+
+
+# Ensure that we don't get "error" results for symlinks encountered
+# during a recursive traversal.
+TESTNUM=43
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}"
+mkdir "${TARGET}/foo"
+mkdir "${TARGET}/bar"
+ln -s "../foo" "${TARGET}/bar/baz"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
+EXPECTED="1"
+"${BIN}" --recursive "${TARGET}"
+ACTUAL=$?
+compare