# Exit codes
#
+EXIT_SUCCESS=0
+
# Exit with this when a test fails.
EXIT_FAILURE=1
# present, we exit with a different (non-EXIT_FAILURE).
EXIT_MISSING_USERS=2
-# Define the users that we'll use in the tests below. We store the
-# names as variables to avoid repeating them everywhere.
+# Define the users and groups that we'll use in the tests below. We
+# store the names as variables to avoid repeating them everywhere.
+# Since GROUPS is already part of everyone's environment, we need
+# a different name.
#
# WARNING: These must be in alphabetical order; otherwise the getfacl
# output will not match.
#
USERS=( bin daemon )
+TESTGROUPS=( bin daemon )
# Check to see if the above users exist. If not, bail.
for idx in $( seq 0 $((${#USERS[@]} - 1)) ); do
- id ${USERS[idx]} >/dev/null 2>&1 || exit $EXIT_MISSING_USERS
+ id "${USERS[idx]}" >/dev/null 2>&1
+
+ if [ $? -ne $EXIT_SUCCESS ]; then
+ echo "Error: missing test user ${USERS[idx]}." 1>&2
+ exit $EXIT_MISSING_USERS
+ fi
done
# The program name.
-BIN=src/apply-default-acl
+BIN=$(realpath src/apply-default-acl)
# The directory where we'll do all the ACL manipulation.
TESTDIR=test
+# Will auto-increment.
+TESTNUM=0
+
acl_reset() {
# Remove any ACLs on our test directory and remove its contents.
setfacl --remove-all --recursive "${TESTDIR}"
# When using a minimal ACL, the default user, group, and other
# permissions should all be propagated to the mode bits.
-TESTNUM=1
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 777 "${TARGET}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# Do the same thing as the last test, except with an extended ACL.
-TESTNUM=2
+((TESTNUM++))
setfacl -d -m user::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
setfacl -d -m group::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
setfacl -d -m other::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# A file shared by a group, should still be group-writable
# afterwards.
-TESTNUM=3
+((TESTNUM++))
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
setfacl -d -m group:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# Same test as before except with a directory.
-TESTNUM=4
+((TESTNUM++))
setfacl -d -m group:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
mkdir "${TARGET}"
chmod 755 "${TARGET}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# With no default, things are left alone.
-TESTNUM=5
+((TESTNUM++))
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 744 "${TARGET}"
$BIN "${TARGET}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# Since the default ACL will grant r-x to group/other, they will wind
# up with it.
-TESTNUM=6
+((TESTNUM++))
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 744 "${TARGET}"
setfacl -d -m user:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# Some named entries can be granted execute permissions as the result
# of reapplication.
-TESTNUM=7
+((TESTNUM++))
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 744 "${TARGET}"
setfacl -m user:${USERS[1]}:rw "${TARGET}"
setfacl -d -m user:${USERS[1]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
$BIN "${TARGET}"
-
EXPECTED=$(cat <<EOF
user::rwx
user:${USERS[0]}:rwx
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# We should not retain any entries that aren't in the default.
-TESTNUM=8
+((TESTNUM++))
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
setfacl -m user:${USERS[1]}:rw "${TARGET}"
setfacl -d -m user:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
$BIN "${TARGET}"
-
EXPECTED=$(cat <<EOF
user::rw-
user:${USERS[0]}:rwx #effective:rw-
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
-# A slightly modified test #1 to make sure it works right.
-TESTNUM=9
+# A slightly modified version of the first test, to make sure it works.
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 777 "${TARGET}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# If the default ACL mask denies execute, we should respect that
# regardless of the existing execute permissions.
-TESTNUM=10
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 777 "${TARGET}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# The --recursive mode should work normally if the argument is a
-# normal file. See Test #1.
-TESTNUM=11
+# normal file. See the first test.
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
setfacl -d -m user::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
setfacl -d -m group::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# The --recursive mode should work recursively.
-TESTNUM=12
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
mkdir -p "${TARGET}"
touch "${TARGET}"/baz
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"/bar/quux`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"/bar/quux)
compare
# The --recursive mode should work recursively. This time
# check a directory, and pass the short command-line flag.
-TESTNUM=13
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
mkdir -p "${TARGET}"
touch "${TARGET}"/baz
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"/bar`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"/bar)
compare
# Test double application on a directory.
#
-TESTNUM=14
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/baz
mkdir "${TARGET}"
chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# Same as previous test, with 755 initial perms.
#
-TESTNUM=15
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/baz
mkdir "${TARGET}"
chmod 755 "${TARGET}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# Same as previous two tests, only with a file.
#
-TESTNUM=16
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# User-executable files should not wind up exec-masked.
-TESTNUM=17
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 700 "${TARGET}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# Group-executable files should not wind up exec-masked.
-TESTNUM=18
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 670 "${TARGET}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
# Other-executable files should not wind up exec-masked.
-TESTNUM=19
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 607 "${TARGET}"
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
-# Test #16's setup repeated with the --no-exec-mask flag.
+
+# Make sure a mask with an execute bit doesn't count as being
+# executable.
#
-TESTNUM=20
+((TESTNUM++))
TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
touch "${TARGET}"
chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
-# The directory allows execute for user, group, and other, so the file
-# should actually inherit them regardless of its initial mode when the
-# --no-exec-mask flag is passed.
-setfacl -d -m user:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
+setfacl -m user::rw "${TARGET}"
+setfacl -m group::rw "${TARGET}"
+# Even though the mask has an 'x' bit, nobody can execute it.
+setfacl -m mask::rwx "${TARGET}"
+setfacl -d -m user::rwx "${TESTDIR}"
+setfacl -d -m group::rwx "${TESTDIR}"
+$BIN "${TARGET}"
-$BIN --no-exec-mask "${TARGET}"
EXPECTED=$(cat <<EOF
-user::rwx
+user::rw-
+group::rw-
+other::r--
+
+EOF
+)
+
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
+compare
+
+
+# Same as the second test, except we pass multiple files on the
+# command line and check the result of the first one.
+((TESTNUM++))
+setfacl -d -m user::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
+setfacl -d -m group::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
+setfacl -d -m other::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
+setfacl -d -m user:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
+DUMMY="${TESTDIR}/dummy"
+touch "${DUMMY}"
+chmod 777 "${DUMMY}"
+touch "${TARGET}"
+chmod 777 "${TARGET}"
+$BIN "${TARGET}" "${DUMMY}"
+
+EXPECTED=$(cat <<EOF
+user::r--
user:${USERS[0]}:rwx
-group::r-x
+group::r--
mask::rwx
-other::r-x
+other::r--
+
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
compare
-# Test #20 repeated recursively to make sure the flags play nice
-# together.
-TESTNUM=21
-PARENT_DIR="${TESTDIR}"/foo
-TARGET="${PARENT_DIR}"/bar
-mkdir "${PARENT_DIR}"
-touch "${TARGET}"
-chmod 644 "${TARGET}"
+# Same as the previous test with the argument order switched.
+((TESTNUM++))
+setfacl -d -m user::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
+setfacl -d -m group::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
+setfacl -d -m other::r-- "${TESTDIR}"
setfacl -d -m user:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
-
-$BIN --recursive --no-exec-mask "${PARENT_DIR}"
+DUMMY="${TESTDIR}/dummy"
+touch "${DUMMY}"
+chmod 777 "${DUMMY}"
+touch "${TARGET}"
+chmod 777 "${TARGET}"
+$BIN "${DUMMY}" "${TARGET}"
EXPECTED=$(cat <<EOF
-user::rwx
+user::r--
user:${USERS[0]}:rwx
-group::r-x
+group::r--
mask::rwx
-other::r-x
+other::r--
+
EOF
)
-ACTUAL=`getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}"`
+ACTUAL=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
+compare
+
+
+# If we call apply-default-acl on a single file that does not exist,
+# we get the expected error.
+((TESTNUM++))
+ACTUAL=$( "${BIN}" test/nonexistent 2>&1 )
+EXPECTED="test/nonexistent: No such file or directory"
compare
+
+# Same as the previous test, but with --recursive.
+((TESTNUM++))
+ACTUAL=$( "${BIN}" --recursive test/nonexistent 2>&1 )
+EXPECTED="test/nonexistent: No such file or directory"
+compare
+
+
+# If we call apply-default-acl on more than one file, it should report any
+# that don't exist (but proceed to operate on the others).
+((TESTNUM++))
+DUMMY1="${TESTDIR}/dummy1"
+DUMMY2="${TESTDIR}/dummy2"
+touch "${DUMMY1}" "${DUMMY2}"
+ACTUAL=$( "${BIN}" "${DUMMY1}" test/nonexistent "${DUMMY2}" 2>&1 )
+EXPECTED="test/nonexistent: No such file or directory"
+compare
+
+
+# Ensure that symlinks are not followed.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
+LINK2TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo-sym"
+touch "${TARGET}"
+ln -s "${TARGET#${TESTDIR}/}" "${LINK2TARGET}"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
+"${BIN}" "${LINK2TARGET}"
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+EXPECTED=$(cat <<EOF
+user::rw-
+group::r--
+other::r--
+
+EOF
+)
+compare
+
+
+# Ensure that symlinks are not followed in subdirectories (recursively).
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/bar"
+touch "${TARGET}"
+mkdir "${TESTDIR}/foo"
+LINK2TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo/bar-sym"
+ln -s "../bar" "${LINK2TARGET}"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}/foo"
+EXPECTED=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
+"${BIN}" --recursive "${TESTDIR}/foo"
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+compare
+
+
+# Ensure that hard links are ignored.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
+LINK2TARGET="${TESTDIR}/bar"
+touch "${TARGET}"
+ln "${TARGET}" "${LINK2TARGET}"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rwx "${TESTDIR}"
+"${BIN}" "${LINK2TARGET}"
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+EXPECTED=$(cat <<EOF
+user::rw-
+group::r--
+other::r--
+
+EOF
+)
+compare
+
+
+# We should be able to run the tool with a relative path from within a
+# directory that contains a symlink, so long as the relative path
+# doesn't contain one.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo/bar"
+LINK2TARGET="${TESTDIR}/baz"
+mkdir -p $(dirname "${TARGET}")
+touch "${TARGET}"
+ln -s foo "${TESTDIR}/baz"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw $(dirname "${TARGET}")
+pushd "${TESTDIR}/baz" > /dev/null
+"${BIN}" bar
+popd > /dev/null
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+EXPECTED=$(cat <<EOF
+user::rw-
+user:${USERS[0]}:rw-
+group::r--
+mask::rw-
+other::r--
+
+EOF
+)
+compare
+
+
+# Ensure that symlinks in non-terminal path components are not followed.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo/bar/baz"
+LINK2FOO="${TESTDIR}/quux"
+mkdir -p $(dirname "${TARGET}")
+touch "${TARGET}"
+ln -s foo "${LINK2FOO}"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw $(dirname "${TARGET}")
+EXPECTED=$(getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}")
+"${BIN}" "${LINK2FOO}/bar/baz"
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+compare
+
+
+# Test that our exit code succeeds on a single, normal path.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
+touch "${TARGET}"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TESTDIR}"
+"${BIN}" "${TARGET}"
+ACTUAL="$?"
+EXPECTED="0"
+compare
+
+
+# Test that our exit code fails on a symlink.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/bar"
+touch "${TESTDIR}/foo"
+ln -s foo "${TARGET}"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TESTDIR}"
+"${BIN}" "${TARGET}"
+ACTUAL="$?"
+EXPECTED="1"
+compare
+
+
+# The previous test should fail, even if we use --recursive.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/bar"
+touch "${TESTDIR}/foo"
+ln -s foo "${TARGET}"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TESTDIR}"
+"${BIN}" --recursive "${TARGET}"
+ACTUAL="$?"
+EXPECTED="1"
+compare
+
+
+# Test the return value for nonexistent paths.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
+"${BIN}" "${TARGET}" &>/dev/null
+ACTUAL="$?"
+EXPECTED="1"
+compare
+
+
+# Test that one "failure" exit code overrides two "successes"
+# We need a default ACL on ${TESTDIR} because otherwise we do
+# nothing, successfully, on the symlink path.
+((TESTNUM++))
+mkdir "${TESTDIR}/foo"
+ln -s foo "${TESTDIR}/bar"
+mkdir "${TESTDIR}/baz"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TESTDIR}"
+"${BIN}" "${TESTDIR}/foo" "${TESTDIR}/bar" "${TESTDIR}/baz"
+ACTUAL="$?"
+EXPECTED="1"
+compare
+
+
+# The failure should prevail when using --recursive, too.
+((TESTNUM++))
+mkdir "${TESTDIR}/foo"
+ln -s foo "${TESTDIR}/bar"
+mkdir "${TESTDIR}/baz"
+"${BIN}" --recursive "${TESTDIR}"
+ACTUAL="$?"
+EXPECTED="1"
+compare
+
+
+# We should get "Not a directory" if we stick a trailing slash on the
+# end of the path to a file.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
+touch "${TARGET}"
+ACTUAL=$( "${BIN}" "${TARGET}/" 2>&1 )
+EXPECTED="${TARGET}/: Not a directory"
+compare
+
+
+# We should be a no-op on files contained in directories that have no
+# default ACL.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
+touch "${TARGET}"
+setfacl --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
+EXPECTED=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+"${BIN}" "${TARGET}"
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+compare
+
+
+# We should be a no-op on directories contained in directories that
+# have no default ACL (same as the previous test, but with a directory).
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo"
+mkdir "${TARGET}"
+setfacl --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
+EXPECTED=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+"${BIN}" --recursive "${TARGET}"
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+compare
+
+
+# Make sure we descend into subdirectories that don't have default ACLs.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo/bar/baz"
+mkdir -p $(dirname "${TARGET}")
+touch "${TARGET}"
+touch "${TARGET}-direct"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw $(dirname "${TARGET}")
+"${BIN}" "${TARGET}-direct"
+EXPECTED=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}-direct" )
+"${BIN}" --recursive "${TESTDIR}"
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+compare
+
+
+# Ensure that we don't get "error" results for symlinks encountered
+# during a recursive traversal.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}"
+mkdir "${TARGET}/foo"
+mkdir "${TARGET}/bar"
+ln -s "../foo" "${TARGET}/bar/baz"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
+EXPECTED="1"
+"${BIN}" --recursive "${TARGET}"
+ACTUAL=$?
+compare
+
+
+# Ensure that "." works as an argument.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}"
+mkdir "${TARGET}/foo"
+mkdir "${TARGET}/bar"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
+"${BIN}" "${TARGET}/foo"
+EXPECTED=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}/foo" )
+pushd "${TARGET}/bar" > /dev/null
+"${BIN}" "."
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "." )
+popd > /dev/null
+compare
+
+# Ensure that "." works as an argument (recursive).
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}"
+mkdir -p "${TARGET}/foo/baz"
+mkdir -p "${TARGET}/bar/baz"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
+"${BIN}" --recursive "${TARGET}/foo"
+EXPECTED=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}/foo/baz" )
+pushd "${TARGET}/bar" > /dev/null
+"${BIN}" --recursive "."
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "./baz" )
+popd > /dev/null
+compare
+
+# Ensure that "./" works as an argument.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}"
+mkdir "${TARGET}/foo"
+mkdir "${TARGET}/bar"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
+"${BIN}" "${TARGET}/foo"
+EXPECTED=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}/foo" )
+pushd "${TARGET}/bar" > /dev/null
+"${BIN}" "./"
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "./" )
+popd > /dev/null
+compare
+
+# Ensure that ".." works as an argument.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}"
+mkdir "${TARGET}/foo"
+mkdir -p "${TARGET}/bar/baz"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
+"${BIN}" "${TARGET}/foo"
+EXPECTED=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}/foo" )
+pushd "${TARGET}/bar/baz" > /dev/null
+"${BIN}" ".."
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header ".." )
+popd > /dev/null
+compare
+
+# Ensure that ".." works as an argument (recursive).
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}"
+mkdir -p "${TARGET}/foo/baz"
+mkdir -p "${TARGET}/bar/baz"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
+"${BIN}" --recursive "${TARGET}/foo"
+EXPECTED=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}/foo/baz" )
+pushd "${TARGET}/bar/baz" > /dev/null
+"${BIN}" --recursive ".."
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "." )
+popd > /dev/null
+compare
+
+# Ensure that "../" works as an argument.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}"
+mkdir "${TARGET}/foo"
+mkdir -p "${TARGET}/bar/baz"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TARGET}"
+"${BIN}" "${TARGET}/foo"
+EXPECTED=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}/foo" )
+pushd "${TARGET}/bar/baz" > /dev/null
+"${BIN}" "../"
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "../" )
+popd > /dev/null
+compare
+
+
+# Ensure that multiple named-user and named-group entries all get
+# applied individually rather than the last one taking precedence.
+# This is a regression test against a bug that made it into a release
+# and was reported by Michał Bartoszkiewicz.
+((TESTNUM++))
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}"
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}"/foo
+touch "${TARGET}"
+setfacl -d -m user:${USERS[0]}:rw- "${TESTDIR}"
+setfacl -d -m group:${TESTGROUPS[0]}:rw- "${TESTDIR}"
+setfacl -d -m user:${USERS[1]}:--- "${TESTDIR}"
+setfacl -d -m group:${TESTGROUPS[1]}:--- "${TESTDIR}"
+"${BIN}" "${TARGET}"
+EXPECTED=$(cat <<EOF
+user::rw-
+user:${USERS[0]}:rw-
+user:${USERS[1]}:---
+group::r--
+group:${TESTGROUPS[0]}:rw-
+group:${TESTGROUPS[1]}:---
+mask::rw-
+other::r--
+
+EOF
+)
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+compare
projects / apply-default-acl.git / blobdiff