X-Git-Url: http://gitweb.michael.orlitzky.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=mjo%2Feja%2FTODO;h=fe18d5634835c97dcc1ee635c4fadecab25787ea;hb=d9bf7b27a9a595ee4566da8f1df753ba9122a033;hp=8f9c17f11c0db462403fdf98faafded920de2839;hpb=cc309b502850fd99abc742ee4ee4e015312f65ac;p=sage.d.git

diff --git a/mjo/eja/TODO b/mjo/eja/TODO
index 8f9c17f..fe18d56 100644
--- a/mjo/eja/TODO
+++ b/mjo/eja/TODO
@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
-1. Finish CartesisnProductEJA: add to_matrix(), random_instance(),
+1. Finish CartesianProductEJA: add to_matrix(), random_instance(),
    one()... methods. This will require rethinking what a "matrix
    representation" and "matrix space" means for a cartesian product
    algebra. Do we want our matrix basis to consist of ordered pairs
-   (or triples, or...)? Should the matrix_space() of the algebra
-   be the cartesian product of the factors' matrix spaces? Can
-   the FDEJA initializer be made to work on tuples, or will it
-   need to be overridden?
+   (or triples, or...)? Should the matrix_space() of the algebra be
+   the cartesian product of the factors' matrix spaces? Can we just
+   fix the matrix basis/space after we call the FDEJA initializer?
 
 2. Add references and start citing them.