X-Git-Url: http://gitweb.michael.orlitzky.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=mjo%2Feja%2FTODO;h=9edb3790ca89f859627c43e59db540b716fe5f16;hb=ba5106550a9a614c6b6f7a2941ddce91ab592934;hp=feaf98ac872145accaa4788419dddd325fde917b;hpb=6230257f359b5ca5aba7c67d564c6176e4ae99c2;p=sage.d.git diff --git a/mjo/eja/TODO b/mjo/eja/TODO index feaf98a..9edb379 100644 --- a/mjo/eja/TODO +++ b/mjo/eja/TODO @@ -1,29 +1,17 @@ -1. Add cartesian products to random_eja(). +1. Add references and start citing them. -2. Add references and start citing them. +2. Profile (and fix?) any remaining slow operations. -3. Implement the octonion simple EJA. +3. When we take a Cartesian product involving a trivial algebra, we + could easily cache the identity and charpoly coefficients using + the nontrivial factor. On the other hand, it's nice that we can + test out some alternate code paths... -4. Pre-cache charpoly for some small algebras? +4. Can we hit "x" with the deortho matrix and delegate to the + _rational_algebra to speed up minimal_polynomial? -RealSymmetricEJA(4): +5. In CartesianProductEJA we already know the multiplication table and + inner product matrix. Refactor things until it's no longer + necessary to duplicate that work. -sage: F = J.base_ring() -sage: a0 = (1/4)*X[4]**2*X[6]**2 - (1/2)*X[2]*X[5]*X[6]**2 - (1/2)*X[3]*X[4]*X[6]*X[7] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[1]*X[5]*X[6]*X[7] + (1/4)*X[3]**2*X[7]**2 - (1/2)*X[0]*X[5]*X[7]**2 + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[2]*X[3]*X[6]*X[8] - (1/2)*X[1]*X[4]*X[6*X[8] - (1/2)*X[1]*X[3]*X[7]*X[8] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[0]*X[4]*X[7]*X[8] + (1/4)*X[1]**2*X[8]**2 - (1/2)*X[0]*X[2]*X[8]**2 - (1/2)*X[2]*X[3]**2*X[9] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[1]*X[3]*X[4]*X[9] - (1/2)*X[0]*X[4]**2*X[9] - (1/2)*X[1]**2*X[5]*X[9] + X[0]*X[2]*X[5]*X[9] - -5. Profile the construction of "large" matrix algebras (like the - 15-dimensional QuaternionHermitianAlgebra(3)) to find out why - they're so slow. - -6. We should compute whether or not the algebra is associative if it - is unknown. I guess the "associative" argument should be ternary - (True, False, None)? We should also figure out the correct - True/False values for the example classes, and of course add an - _is_associative() method. - -7. When field=RDF, subalgebra construction is failing because the - inner product isn't associative? Actually, it's the combination - of field=RDF and orthonormalize=True. - -8. Set check_axioms=False for element-subalgebras outside of once or - twice in the test suite. +6. Figure out how to remove Unital() from subalgebras.