X-Git-Url: http://gitweb.michael.orlitzky.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=mjo%2Feja%2FTODO;h=70e945ed4bbe499bd6dde2a92c0153e30f1dede0;hb=5b1f16399286eba471884a1cfe45247b3a0a7693;hp=b27f2f12875e317fd2b088a74d7395c84ab8e454;hpb=bfaac3f5d42f31fabb37a5260fd5b870f639ea59;p=sage.d.git

diff --git a/mjo/eja/TODO b/mjo/eja/TODO
index b27f2f1..70e945e 100644
--- a/mjo/eja/TODO
+++ b/mjo/eja/TODO
@@ -1,32 +1,26 @@
-1. Add CartesianProductEJA.
+1. Add cartesian products to random_eja().
 
 2. Add references and start citing them.
 
 3. Implement the octonion simple EJA.
 
-4. Factor out the unit-norm basis (and operator symmetry) tests once
-   all of the algebras pass.
+4. Pre-cache charpoly for some small algebras?
 
-5. Override inner_product(), _max_test_case_size(), et cetera in
-   DirectSumEJA.
+RealSymmetricEJA(4):
 
-6. Switch to QQ in *all* algebras for _charpoly_coefficients().
-   This only works when we know that the basis can be rationalized...
-   which is the case at least for the concrete EJAs we provide,
-   but not in general.
+sage: F = J.base_ring()
+sage: a0 = (1/4)*X[4]**2*X[6]**2 - (1/2)*X[2]*X[5]*X[6]**2 - (1/2)*X[3]*X[4]*X[6]*X[7] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[1]*X[5]*X[6]*X[7] + (1/4)*X[3]**2*X[7]**2 - (1/2)*X[0]*X[5]*X[7]**2 + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[2]*X[3]*X[6]*X[8] - (1/2)*X[1]*X[4]*X[6*X[8] - (1/2)*X[1]*X[3]*X[7]*X[8] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[0]*X[4]*X[7]*X[8] + (1/4)*X[1]**2*X[8]**2 - (1/2)*X[0]*X[2]*X[8]**2 - (1/2)*X[2]*X[3]**2*X[9] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[1]*X[3]*X[4]*X[9] - (1/2)*X[0]*X[4]**2*X[9] - (1/2)*X[1]**2*X[5]*X[9] + X[0]*X[2]*X[5]*X[9]
 
-7. Pass already_echelonized (default: False) and echelon_basis
-   (default: None) into the subalgebra constructor. The value of
-   already_echelonized can be passed to V.span_of_basis() to save
-   some time, and usinf e.g. FreeModule_submodule_with_basis_field
-   we may somehow be able to pass the echelon basis straight in to
-   save time.
+5. Profile the construction of "large" matrix algebras (like the
+   15-dimensional QuaternionHermitianAlgebra(3)) to find out why
+   they're so slow.
 
-   This may require supporting "basis" as a list of basis vectors
-   (as opposed to superalgebra elements) in the subalgebra constructor.
+6. We should compute whether or not the algebra is associative if it
+   is unknown. I guess the "associative" argument should be ternary
+   (True, False, None)? We should also figure out the correct
+   True/False values for the example classes, and of course add an
+   _is_associative() method.
 
-8. Implement random_instance() for general algebras as random_eja().
-   Copy/paste the "general" construction into the other classes that
-   can use it. The general construction can be something like "call
-   random_instance() on something that inherits me and return the
-   result."
+7. When field=RDF, subalgebra construction is failing because the
+   inner product isn't associative? Actually, it's the combination
+   of field=RDF and orthonormalize=True.