X-Git-Url: http://gitweb.michael.orlitzky.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=mjo%2Feja%2FTODO;h=38cff88c1584b5be8c6a6ce7e90a47b8350adce3;hb=2eead94218aad1f63faec9cdeacc30171a880438;hp=b2495b59f3264e5d638a59f6630daa77214cdb50;hpb=5ce914aa8f29ad8d9d80b85b8ea33dd0cd735d4f;p=sage.d.git

diff --git a/mjo/eja/TODO b/mjo/eja/TODO
index b2495b5..38cff88 100644
--- a/mjo/eja/TODO
+++ b/mjo/eja/TODO
@@ -1,19 +1,8 @@
-1. Add CartesianProductEJA.
+1. Add references and start citing them.
 
-2. Check the axioms in the constructor when check != False?
+2. Profile (and fix?) any remaining slow operations.
 
-3. Add references and start citing them.
-
-4. Implement the octonion simple EJA.
-
-5. Factor out the unit-norm basis (and operator symmetry) tests once
-   all of the algebras pass.
-
-6. Implement spectral projector decomposition for EJA operators
-   using jordan_form() or eigenmatrix_right(). I suppose we can
-   ignore the problem of base rings for now and just let it crash
-   if we're not using AA as our base field.
-
-7. Do we really need to orthonormalize the basis in a subalgebra?
-   So long as we can decompose the operator (which is invariant
-   under changes of basis), who cares?
+3. When we take a Cartesian product involving a trivial algebra, we
+   could easily cache the identity and charpoly coefficients using
+   the nontrivial factor. On the other hand, it's nice that we can
+   test out some alternate code paths...