X-Git-Url: http://gitweb.michael.orlitzky.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=mjo%2Feja%2FTODO;h=1407ebdbe83bafab1ef79d881d25d2cf4912e18e;hb=ee9ac102b8b392793466c13039a6e50b1e3c4c01;hp=8f9c17f11c0db462403fdf98faafded920de2839;hpb=cc309b502850fd99abc742ee4ee4e015312f65ac;p=sage.d.git diff --git a/mjo/eja/TODO b/mjo/eja/TODO index 8f9c17f..1407ebd 100644 --- a/mjo/eja/TODO +++ b/mjo/eja/TODO @@ -1,11 +1,7 @@ -1. Finish CartesisnProductEJA: add to_matrix(), random_instance(), - one()... methods. This will require rethinking what a "matrix - representation" and "matrix space" means for a cartesian product - algebra. Do we want our matrix basis to consist of ordered pairs - (or triples, or...)? Should the matrix_space() of the algebra - be the cartesian product of the factors' matrix spaces? Can - the FDEJA initializer be made to work on tuples, or will it - need to be overridden? +1. Finish CartesianProductEJA: add to_matrix(), random_instance(),... + methods. I guess we should create a separate class hierarchy for + Cartesian products of RationalBasisEJA? That way we get fast + charpoly and random_instance() defined... 2. Add references and start citing them. @@ -18,9 +14,6 @@ RealSymmetricEJA(4): sage: F = J.base_ring() sage: a0 = (1/4)*X[4]**2*X[6]**2 - (1/2)*X[2]*X[5]*X[6]**2 - (1/2)*X[3]*X[4]*X[6]*X[7] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[1]*X[5]*X[6]*X[7] + (1/4)*X[3]**2*X[7]**2 - (1/2)*X[0]*X[5]*X[7]**2 + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[2]*X[3]*X[6]*X[8] - (1/2)*X[1]*X[4]*X[6*X[8] - (1/2)*X[1]*X[3]*X[7]*X[8] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[0]*X[4]*X[7]*X[8] + (1/4)*X[1]**2*X[8]**2 - (1/2)*X[0]*X[2]*X[8]**2 - (1/2)*X[2]*X[3]**2*X[9] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[1]*X[3]*X[4]*X[9] - (1/2)*X[0]*X[4]**2*X[9] - (1/2)*X[1]**2*X[5]*X[9] + X[0]*X[2]*X[5]*X[9] -5. The main EJA element constructor is happy to convert between - e.g. HadamardEJA(3) and JordanSpinEJA(3). - -6. Profile the construction of "large" matrix algebras (like the +5. Profile the construction of "large" matrix algebras (like the 15-dimensional QuaternionHermitianAlgebra(3)) to find out why they're so slow.