X-Git-Url: http://gitweb.michael.orlitzky.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=examples.tex;h=f33ed747d4f5e03dd3cb33f7106e9a417d8f2748;hb=a9d942d6d7226cdf87be5b8cef9743d30d75ce06;hp=ee0409699b5a5041fe833e90dac720b8223d04f1;hpb=16277f17cbd1a3c797d13cc2724784eedc207f22;p=mjotex.git diff --git a/examples.tex b/examples.tex index ee04096..f33ed74 100644 --- a/examples.tex +++ b/examples.tex @@ -28,20 +28,29 @@ \begin{section}{Arrow} The identity operator on $V$ is $\identity{V}$. The composition of $f$ and $g$ is $\compose{f}{g}$. The inverse of $f$ is - $\inverse{f}$. + $\inverse{f}$. If $f$ is a function and $A$ is a subset of its + domain, then the preimage under $f$ of $A$ is $\preimage{f}{A}$. \end{section} \begin{section}{Common} The function $f$ applied to $x$ is $f\of{x}$. We can group terms like $a + \qty{b - c}$ or $a + \qty{b - \sqty{c - d}}$. Here's a set $\set{1,2,3} = \setc{n \in \Nn[1]}{ n \le 3 }$. Here's a pair - of things $\pair{1}{2}$ or a triple of them - $\triple{1}{2}{3}$. The Cartesian product of two sets $A$ and $B$ - is $\cartprod{A}{B}$; if we take the product with $C$ as well, - then we obtain $\cartprodthree{A}{B}{C}$. The direct sum of $V$ - and $W$ is $\directsum{V}{W}$ and the factorial of the number $10$ - is $\factorial{10}$. - + of things $\pair{1}{2}$ or a triple of them $\triple{1}{2}{3}$, + and the factorial of the number $10$ is $\factorial{10}$. + + The Cartesian product of two sets $A$ and $B$ is + $\cartprod{A}{B}$; if we take the product with $C$ as well, then + we obtain $\cartprodthree{A}{B}{C}$. The direct sum of $V$ and $W$ + is $\directsum{V}{W}$. Or three things, + $\directsumthree{U}{V}{W}$. How about more things? Like + $\directsummany{k=1}{\infty}{V_{k}} \ne + \cartprodmany{k=1}{\infty}{V_{k}}$. Those direct sums and + cartesian products adapt nicely to display equations: + % + \begin{equation*} + \directsummany{k=1}{\infty}{V_{k}} \ne \cartprodmany{k=1}{\infty}{V_{k}}. + \end{equation*} Here are a few common tuple spaces that should not have a superscript when that superscript would be one: $\Nn[1]$, $\Zn[1]$, $\Qn[1]$, $\Rn[1]$, $\Cn[1]$. However, if the @@ -55,12 +64,11 @@ (indexed) union and intersections of things, like $\unionmany{k=1}{\infty}{A_{k}}$ or $\intersectmany{k=1}{\infty}{B_{k}}$. The best part about those - are that they do the right thing in a display equation: + is that they do the right thing in a display equation: % \begin{equation*} \unionmany{k=1}{\infty}{A_{k}} = \intersectmany{k=1}{\infty}{B_{k}} \end{equation*} - % \end{section} \begin{section}{Cone} @@ -103,6 +111,30 @@ The set of all bounded linear operators from $V$ to $W$ is $\boundedops[W]{V}$. If $W = V$, then we write $\boundedops{V}$ instead. + + The direct sum of $V$ and $W$ is $\directsum{V}{W}$, of course, + but what if $W = V^{\perp}$? Then we wish to indicate that fact by + writing $\directsumperp{V}{W}$. That operator should survive a + display equation, too, and the weight of the circle should match + that of the usual direct sum operator. + % + \begin{align*} + Z = \directsumperp{V}{W}\\ + \oplus \oplusperp \oplus \oplusperp + \end{align*} + % + Its form should also survive in different font sizes... + \Large + \begin{align*} + Z = \directsumperp{V}{W}\\ + \oplus \oplusperp \oplus \oplusperp + \end{align*} + \Huge + \begin{align*} + Z = \directsumperp{V}{W}\\ + \oplus \oplusperp \oplus \oplusperp + \end{align*} + \normalsize \end{section} \begin{section}{Listing} @@ -236,5 +268,5 @@ The interior of a set $X$ is $\interior{X}$. Its closure is $\closure{X}$ and its boundary is $\boundary{X}$. \end{section} - + \end{document}