eja: split "check" args into check_field and check_axioms.

[sage.d.git] / mjo / eja / TODO

diff --git a/mjo/eja/TODO b/mjo/eja/TODO
index 51c2a33b542569c431d986a0d165d8774b0d49eb..e8a2a8d4fc8988b1ad6f744a69daba9cf0582397 100644 (file)
--- a/mjo/eja/TODO
+++ b/mjo/eja/TODO
@@ -1,21 +1,13 @@
 1. Add CartesianProductEJA.
 
-2. Check the axioms in the constructor when check != False?
+2. Add references and start citing them.
 
-3. Add references and start citing them.
+3. Implement the octonion simple EJA.
 
-4. Implement the octonion simple EJA.
-
-5. Factor out the unit-norm basis (and operator symmetry) tests once
+4. Factor out the unit-norm basis (and operator symmetry) tests once
    all of the algebras pass.
 
-6. Implement spectral projector decomposition for EJA operators
-   using jordan_form() or eigenmatrix_right(). I suppose we can
-   ignore the problem of base rings for now and just let it crash
-   if we're not using AA as our base field.
-
-7. Do we really need to orthonormalize the basis in a subalgebra?
-   So long as we can decompose the operator (which is invariant
-   under changes of basis), who cares?
+5. Override inner_product(), _max_test_case_size(), et cetera in
+   DirectSumEJA.
 
-8. Check that our field is a subring of RLF.
+6. Switch to QQ in *all* algebras for _charpoly_coefficients().