eja: don't compute an unused vector space for the element subalgebra.

[sage.d.git] / mjo / eja / TODO

diff --git a/mjo/eja/TODO b/mjo/eja/TODO
index b2495b59f3264e5d638a59f6630daa77214cdb50..76b9eaf1dcf19f3c8385bd1f0486128b005ca3f2 100644 (file)
--- a/mjo/eja/TODO
+++ b/mjo/eja/TODO
@@ -1,19 +1,20 @@
 1. Add CartesianProductEJA.
 
-2. Check the axioms in the constructor when check != False?
+2. Add references and start citing them.
 
-3. Add references and start citing them.
+3. Implement the octonion simple EJA.
 
-4. Implement the octonion simple EJA.
-
-5. Factor out the unit-norm basis (and operator symmetry) tests once
+4. Factor out the unit-norm basis (and operator symmetry) tests once
    all of the algebras pass.
 
-6. Implement spectral projector decomposition for EJA operators
-   using jordan_form() or eigenmatrix_right(). I suppose we can
-   ignore the problem of base rings for now and just let it crash
-   if we're not using AA as our base field.
+5. Override inner_product(), _max_test_case_size(), et cetera in
+   DirectSumEJA.
+
+6. Switch to QQ in *all* algebras for _charpoly_coefficients().
 
-7. Do we really need to orthonormalize the basis in a subalgebra?
-   So long as we can decompose the operator (which is invariant
-   under changes of basis), who cares?
+7. Pass already_echelonized (default: False) and echelon_basis
+   (default: None) into the subalgebra constructor. The value of
+   already_echelonized can be passed to V.span_of_basis() to save
+   some time, and usinf e.g. FreeModule_submodule_with_basis_field
+   we may somehow be able to pass the echelon basis straight in to
+   save time.