eja: move the "field" argument to (usually passed through) kwargs.

[sage.d.git] / mjo / eja / TODO

diff --git a/mjo/eja/TODO b/mjo/eja/TODO
index 98314cea72c13f0d58a54f2e16ad0067e740336b..08b8e81b22e8b5fde0a368e11840267edab4d250 100644 (file)
--- a/mjo/eja/TODO
+++ b/mjo/eja/TODO
@@ -1,23 +1,28 @@
-1. Add CartesianProductEJA.
+1. Finish DirectSumEJA: add to_matrix(), random_instance(),
+   one()... methods. Make it subclass RationalBasisEuclideanJordanAlgebra.
+   This is not a general direct sum / cartesian product implementation,
+   it's used only with the other rationalbasis algebras (to make non-
+   simple EJAs out of the simple ones).
 
-2. Check the axioms in the constructor when check != False?
+2. Add references and start citing them.
 
-3. Add references and start citing them.
+3. Implement the octonion simple EJA.
 
-4. Implement the octonion simple EJA.
+4. Pre-cache charpoly for some small algebras?
 
-5. Factor out the unit-norm basis (and operator symmetry) tests once
-   all of the algebras pass.
+RealSymmetricEJA(4):
 
-6. Implement spectral projector decomposition for EJA operators
-   using jordan_form() or eigenmatrix_right(). I suppose we can
-   ignore the problem of base rings for now and just let it crash
-   if we're not using AA as our base field.
+sage: F = J.base_ring()
+sage: a0 = (1/4)*X[4]**2*X[6]**2 - (1/2)*X[2]*X[5]*X[6]**2 - (1/2)*X[3]*X[4]*X[6]*X[7] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[1]*X[5]*X[6]*X[7] + (1/4)*X[3]**2*X[7]**2 - (1/2)*X[0]*X[5]*X[7]**2 + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[2]*X[3]*X[6]*X[8] - (1/2)*X[1]*X[4]*X[6*X[8] - (1/2)*X[1]*X[3]*X[7]*X[8] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[0]*X[4]*X[7]*X[8] + (1/4)*X[1]**2*X[8]**2 - (1/2)*X[0]*X[2]*X[8]**2 - (1/2)*X[2]*X[3]**2*X[9] + (F(2).sqrt()/2)*X[1]*X[3]*X[4]*X[9] - (1/2)*X[0]*X[4]**2*X[9] - (1/2)*X[1]**2*X[5]*X[9] + X[0]*X[2]*X[5]*X[9]
 
-7. Do we really need to orthonormalize the basis in a subalgebra?
-   So long as we can decompose the operator (which is invariant
-   under changes of basis), who cares?
+5. Compute the scalar in the general natural_inner_product() for
+   matrices, so no overrides are necessary.
 
-8. Ensure that we can construct all algebras over both AA and RR.
+6. The main EJA element constructor is happy to convert between
+   e.g. HadamardEJA(3) and JordanSpinEJA(3).
 
-9. Check that our field is a subring of RLF.
+7. Figure out if CombinatorialFreeModule's use of IndexedGenerators
+   can be used to replace the matrix_basis().
+
+9. Add back the check_field=False and check_axioms=False parameters
+   for the EJAs we've constructed ourselves.