-value_at v3d i j k
- | i < 0 = value_at v3d 0 j k
- | j < 0 = value_at v3d i 0 k
- | k < 0 = value_at v3d i j 0
- | xsize <= i = value_at v3d (xsize - 1) j k
- | ysize <= j = value_at v3d i (ysize - 1) k
- | zsize <= k = value_at v3d i j (zsize - 1)
- | otherwise = idx v3d i j k
+value_at v3d !i !j !k
+ -- Put the most common case first!
+ | (valid_i i) && (valid_j j) && (valid_k k) =
+ idx v3d i j k
+
+ -- The next three are from the first line in (7.3). Analogous cases
+ -- have been added where the indices are one-too-big. These are the
+ -- "one index is bad" cases.
+ | not (valid_i i) =
+ if (dim_i == 1)
+ then
+ -- We're one-dimensional in our first coordinate, so just
+ -- return the data point that we do have. If we try to use
+ -- the formula from remark 7.3, we go into an infinite loop.
+ value_at v3d 0 j k
+ else
+ if (i == -1)
+ then
+ 2*(value_at v3d 0 j k) - (value_at v3d 1 j k)
+ else
+ 2*(value_at v3d (i-1) j k) - (value_at v3d (i-2) j k)
+
+ | not (valid_j j) =
+ if (dim_j == 1)
+ then
+ -- We're one-dimensional in our second coordinate, so just
+ -- return the data point that we do have. If we try to use
+ -- the formula from remark 7.3, we go into an infinite loop.
+ value_at v3d i 0 k
+ else
+ if (j == -1)
+ then
+ 2*(value_at v3d i 0 k) - (value_at v3d i 1 k)
+ else
+ 2*(value_at v3d i (j-1) k) - (value_at v3d i (j-2) k)
+
+ | not (valid_k k) =
+ if (dim_k == 1)
+ then
+ -- We're one-dimensional in our third coordinate, so just
+ -- return the data point that we do have. If we try to use
+ -- the formula from remark 7.3, we go into an infinite loop.
+ value_at v3d i j 0
+ else
+ if (k == -1)
+ then
+ 2*(value_at v3d i j 0) - (value_at v3d i j 1)
+ else
+ 2*(value_at v3d i j (k-1)) - (value_at v3d i j (k-2))