compare
-# The previous test should "succeed" if we use --recursive. This is
-# buggy, but it's documented.
+# The previous test should fail, even if we use --recursive.
TESTNUM=35
TARGET="${TESTDIR}/bar"
touch "${TESTDIR}/foo"
setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw "${TESTDIR}"
"${BIN}" --recursive "${TARGET}"
ACTUAL="$?"
-EXPECTED="0"
+EXPECTED="1"
compare
compare
-# And test the buggy behavior again; the previous test should return
-# success (ignoring the failure) when --recursive is used.
+# The failure should prevail when using --recursive, too.
TESTNUM=38
mkdir "${TESTDIR}/foo"
ln -s foo "${TESTDIR}/bar"
mkdir "${TESTDIR}/baz"
"${BIN}" --recursive "${TESTDIR}"
ACTUAL="$?"
-EXPECTED="0"
+EXPECTED="1"
compare
"${BIN}" --recursive "${TARGET}"
ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
compare
+
+
+# Make sure we descend into subdirectories that don't have default ACLs.
+TESTNUM=42
+TARGET="${TESTDIR}/foo/bar/baz"
+mkdir -p $(dirname "${TARGET}")
+touch "${TARGET}"
+touch "${TARGET}-direct"
+setfacl --default --modify user:${USERS[0]}:rw $(dirname "${TARGET}")
+"${BIN}" "${TARGET}-direct"
+EXPECTED=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}-direct" )
+"${BIN}" --recursive "${TESTDIR}"
+ACTUAL=$( getfacl --omit-header "${TARGET}" )
+compare